<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

    <rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
     <channel>
        <title>Southern Zone - New Zealand Four Wheel Drive Association Inc.</title>
        <link>http://www.nzfwda.org.nz/rss/c34/</link>
        <description></description>
        <dc:language>en-us</dc:language> 
        <dc:creator>NZFWDA.org.nz</dc:creator> 
        <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.xaraya.org" /> 
        <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:website@nzfwda.org.nz" /> 
       <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> 
       <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> 
       <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>

 



   <item>
        
        <title>Canterbury CMS progress</title>
        <link>http://www.nzfwda.org.nz/news/184</link>
       <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:03:51 GMT</pubDate>
        <content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
	<p>
	Greetings everyone 
	<br />
	(there are 58 of you who have provided feedback so far; many thanks) 
	</p>
	<p>
	The latest news is that within a day or
	so, the first six of the proposed twelve &quot;place&quot; sections for the CMS
	will be added to the <a rel="nofollow">www.doc.govt.nz/canterburycms</a>
	web page. As explained on the web page these are &quot;consultative drafts&quot;;
	they are uncompleted, slightly rough, works-in-progress on which we
	welcome your informal comment.
	</p>
	<p>
	The six &quot;places&quot; are:
	</p>
	<p>
	2.1 Aoraki/Mount Cook and Arthur's Pass National Parks
	<br />
	2.2 Braided Rivers/Ki Utu Ki Tai
	<br />
	2.3A Te Moutere Ki Whakaraupo
	<br />
	2.4 Coastal Wetlands, their Spits and Barriers
	<br />
	2.5 Conservation and Forest Parks
	<br />
	2.11 Canterbury's Nature and Scientific Reserves
	</p>
	<p>
	The remaining six &quot;place&quot; sections (see
	the outlines for these on the web page's &quot;see also&quot; list) and the
	management objectives chapters (again, see the &quot;see also&quot; list) will be
	added to the web page during October &amp; November.
	</p>
	<p>
	Your comments are awaited.......
	</p>
	<p>
	Regards,
	</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
	Poma Palmer<br />
	Management Planner<br />
	Canterbury Conservancy<br />
	Pte Bag 4715, Christchurch<br />
	(03) 371 3745
</blockquote>
<p><small>NZFWDA.org.nz | Kindly sponsored by <a href="http://www.jeep.co.nz/">Jeep</a> and <a href="http://www.arb4x4.com.au/">ARB</a></small></p> ]]></content:encoded>
        <description><blockquote>
	<p>
	Greetings everyone 
	<br />
	(there are 58 of you who have provided feedback so far; many thanks) 
	</p>
	<p>
	The latest news is that within a day or
	so, the first six of the proposed twelve &quot;place&quot; sections for the CMS
	will be added to the <a rel="nofollow">www.doc.govt.nz/canterburycms</a>
	web page. As explained on the web page these are &quot;consultative drafts&quot;;
	they are uncompleted, slightly rough, works-in-progress on which we
	welcome your informal comment.
	</p>
	<p>
	The six &quot;places&quot; are:
	</p>
	<p>
	2.1 Aoraki/Mount Cook and Arthur's Pass National Parks
	<br />
	2.2 Braided Rivers/Ki Utu Ki Tai
	<br />
	2.3A Te Moutere Ki Whakaraupo
	<br />
	2.4 Coastal Wetlands, their Spits and Barriers
	<br />
	2.5 Conservation and Forest Parks
	<br />
	2.11 Canterbury's Nature and Scientific Reserves
	</p>
	<p>
	The remaining six &quot;place&quot; sections (see
	the outlines for these on the web page's &quot;see also&quot; list) and the
	management objectives chapters (again, see the &quot;see also&quot; list) will be
	added to the web page during October &amp; November.
	</p>
	<p>
	Your comments are awaited.......
	</p>
	<p>
	Regards,
	</p>
</blockquote>
<blockquote>
	Poma Palmer<br />
	Management Planner<br />
	Canterbury Conservancy<br />
	Pte Bag 4715, Christchurch<br />
	(03) 371 3745
</blockquote>
<p><small>NZFWDA.org.nz | Kindly sponsored by <a href="http://www.jeep.co.nz/">Jeep</a> and <a href="http://www.arb4x4.com.au/">ARB</a></small></p></description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nzfwda.org.nz/news/184</guid>
   </item>


   <item>
        
        <title>Canterbury Conservation Management Strategy review</title>
        <link>http://www.nzfwda.org.nz/news/141</link>
       <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:22:20 GMT</pubDate>
        <content:format rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" />
        <content:encoded><![CDATA[ <p>
<a href="http://www.doc.govt.nz/templates/page.aspx?id=46394">http://www.doc.govt.nz/templates/page.aspx?id=46394</a> 
</p>
<h4>Who can make contributions?</h4>
<p>
Anyone! We want to hear from as many people as possible who have an
interest in how DOC manages public conservation land in Canterbury <strong>before</strong> we produce the draft CMS. After all, we are managing conservation for <strong>all</strong> New Zealanders!
</p>
<p>
<strong> August update from DOC </strong>
</p>
<p>
First, many thanks for the feedback;
over 50 responses have been received. The responses have been
wide-ranging in the nature of your interests and organisations, and in
your identified important issues and places. Your responses do seem to
have come from a wider cross-section of the community than previous
Conservancy planning processes; maybe that is the power of the
internet. 
</p>
<p>
No management issues or places
previously unknown to us were identified, but your concerns were clear.
I will be grouping  your feedback forms into common issues and/or
places (some will fit into several groups) and will provide them to the
authors for the various chapters/sections of the CMS.
</p>
<p>
Two points to clarify:
</p>
<ul>
	<li>This feedback stage is informal
	and non-statutory; a means of letting you into the CMS review process
	before the stage of the formal/statutory draft CMS and its submissions
	and hearings processes (all early to mid 2009).</li>
	<li>There will be no hearings for the feedback information you have provided, but see below.</li><br />
</ul>
<p>
Where to from here?
</p>
<ul>
	<li>I have <strong>extended the initial feedback date until late August</strong>, by which time the additional process below will be well underway. </li>
	<li>Department staff are working on the CMS
	Part One (Management objectives and policies) chapters as listed in the
	Conservancy overview, and working on the draft Place sections, both
	chapters and sections as listed on the canterburycms web page.
	Completion dates for initial draft text is the end of September.</li>
	<li>From late August, these 'initial draft'
	sections will start to be posted on the web site for further informal
	comment. Some sections I am anticipating that certain groups will want
	to discuss with the Department; this process has already started. </li>
	<li><strong>Some issues will require more
	structured workshops between Department staff and public interest
	groups; one of these will be for off-road vehicles (motorised and
	mountain bikes) and planning for this will happen very soon.</strong></li><br />
</ul>
<p>
One slight disadvantage of public
involvement early in the process is that the cross-connections between
different parts of the CMS are not always clear and getting the whole
CMS picture can be difficult. For example, when considering some of the
place sections (e.g. Conservation and Forest Parks) and that within
those there is a cross-reference to the management objectives and
policies chapters (e.g. 1.3.1 Terrestrial and Freshwater Ecosystems,
Habitats and Species). I ask that you bear with us on this as the whole
CMS process is very fluid; with many staff involved then many factors
influence when draft parts of the CMS become available, but in the end
it does all come together. It is your call on when and with what parts
of the CMS you provide comment on.
</p>
<p>
So, thanks again, keep an eye on the web
page, let others know that they can still send in feedback forms, and
call or email me if you have any questions or you would like to meet.
</p>
<p>
<em>Poma Palmer </em>
</p>
<p>
There is a background Powerpoint  presentation (visual only) on this CMS review, available on the NZFWDA forum and found under &quot;Reference&quot; 
</p>
<p>
<strong> Part of the  CMS review process is the identification of &quot;Places&quot; that have special characteristics.  These areas have their own sections within the CMS. A proposed list can be downloaded from the web page below. There are several other documents available too. </strong>
</p>
<p>
It is important to four wheeling that the wording covering the 'Places' does not deny 4x4 recreation. Watch the DOC website carefully for updates.
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.doc.govt.nz/templates/page.aspx?id=46394">www.doc.govt.nz/templates/page.aspx?id=46394
</a>
</p>
<p>
&#160;
</p>
<br />
<p><small>NZFWDA.org.nz | Kindly sponsored by <a href="http://www.jeep.co.nz/">Jeep</a> and <a href="http://www.arb4x4.com.au/">ARB</a></small></p> ]]></content:encoded>
        <description><p>
<a href="http://www.doc.govt.nz/templates/page.aspx?id=46394">http://www.doc.govt.nz/templates/page.aspx?id=46394</a> 
</p>
<h4>Who can make contributions?</h4>
<p>
Anyone! We want to hear from as many people as possible who have an
interest in how DOC manages public conservation land in Canterbury <strong>before</strong> we produce the draft CMS. After all, we are managing conservation for <strong>all</strong> New Zealanders!
</p>
<p>
<strong> August update from DOC </strong>
</p>
<p>
First, many thanks for the feedback;
over 50 responses have been received. The responses have been
wide-ranging in the nature of your interests and organisations, and in
your identified important issues and places. Your responses do seem to
have come from a wider cross-section of the community than previous
Conservancy planning processes; maybe that is the power of the
internet. 
</p>
<p>
No management issues or places
previously unknown to us were identified, but your concerns were clear.
I will be grouping  your feedback forms into common issues and/or
places (some will fit into several groups) and will provide them to the
authors for the various chapters/sections of the CMS.
</p>
<p>
Two points to clarify:
</p>
<ul>
	<li>This feedback stage is informal
	and non-statutory; a means of letting you into the CMS review process
	before the stage of the formal/statutory draft CMS and its submissions
	and hearings processes (all early to mid 2009).</li>
	<li>There will be no hearings for the feedback information you have provided, but see below.</li><br />
</ul>
<p>
Where to from here?
</p>
<ul>
	<li>I have <strong>extended the initial feedback date until late August</strong>, by which time the additional process below will be well underway. </li>
	<li>Department staff are working on the CMS
	Part One (Management objectives and policies) chapters as listed in the
	Conservancy overview, and working on the draft Place sections, both
	chapters and sections as listed on the canterburycms web page.
	Completion dates for initial draft text is the end of September.</li>
	<li>From late August, these 'initial draft'
	sections will start to be posted on the web site for further informal
	comment. Some sections I am anticipating that certain groups will want
	to discuss with the Department; this process has already started. </li>
	<li><strong>Some issues will require more
	structured workshops between Department staff and public interest
	groups; one of these will be for off-road vehicles (motorised and
	mountain bikes) and planning for this will happen very soon.</strong></li><br />
</ul>
<p>
One slight disadvantage of public
involvement early in the process is that the cross-connections between
different parts of the CMS are not always clear and getting the whole
CMS picture can be difficult. For example, when considering some of the
place sections (e.g. Conservation and Forest Parks) and that within
those there is a cross-reference to the management objectives and
policies chapters (e.g. 1.3.1 Terrestrial and Freshwater Ecosystems,
Habitats and Species). I ask that you bear with us on this as the whole
CMS process is very fluid; with many staff involved then many factors
influence when draft parts of the CMS become available, but in the end
it does all come together. It is your call on when and with what parts
of the CMS you provide comment on.
</p>
<p>
So, thanks again, keep an eye on the web
page, let others know that they can still send in feedback forms, and
call or email me if you have any questions or you would like to meet.
</p>
<p>
<em>Poma Palmer </em>
</p>
<p>
There is a background Powerpoint  presentation (visual only) on this CMS review, available on the NZFWDA forum and found under &quot;Reference&quot; 
</p>
<p>
<strong> Part of the  CMS review process is the identification of &quot;Places&quot; that have special characteristics.  These areas have their own sections within the CMS. A proposed list can be downloaded from the web page below. There are several other documents available too. </strong>
</p>
<p>
It is important to four wheeling that the wording covering the 'Places' does not deny 4x4 recreation. Watch the DOC website carefully for updates.
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://www.doc.govt.nz/templates/page.aspx?id=46394">www.doc.govt.nz/templates/page.aspx?id=46394
</a>
</p>
<p>
&#160;
</p>
<br />
<p><small>NZFWDA.org.nz | Kindly sponsored by <a href="http://www.jeep.co.nz/">Jeep</a> and <a href="http://www.arb4x4.com.au/">ARB</a></small></p></description>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.nzfwda.org.nz/news/141</guid>
   </item>

   </channel>
</rss>
